Creation ex nihilo
not remodeling preexisting stuff—beginning as gift, word, or absolute dependence
Creation ex nihilo crystallized as a canonical Christian and later Islamic emphasis: God creates without borrowing from a coeval chaos-as-matter (even where mythic images of waters persist poetically). Jewish thinkers debate how sharply to distinguish rabbinic formulations from Platonic or Stoic inheritances; Hindu cosmogonies offer multiple narratives—emanation, sacrifice, divine dreaming—where “nothing” and “something” play different chords.
Philosophically, ex nihilo sharpens the question of dependence: finite being as sheer gift rather than partnership with necessity. Detractors ask for compatibility with science; defenders often distinguish explanatory creation from chronological storytelling.
This entry frames creation ex nihilo as a telos-adjacent concept—about the world’s status relative to God or ultimacy, shaping prayer, gratitude, and ecological sensibility alike.
- Figures
- Augustine of Hippo ·Thomas Aquinas ·Moses Maimonides ·Plato ·Brahma
- Traditions
- Christianity ·Judaism ·Islam ·Hinduism
- Related
- Cosmological argument ·Divine attributes ·Eschatology ·Monotheism ·Revelation